Corey mentioned the other day that he was confused about the different advice given by different attorneys, including Doug Lodmell and Garrett Sutton. He also told me that he was a bit confused about where to form entities, as he had heard both good and bad about Nevada LLC's.
Different opinions from different advisors is always a concern. That is precisely why, at ProVision, we recommend a solid, informed Wealth Coach (http://www.provisionwealth.com/strategic_wealth_coaching.asp) to explain the differences and how to decide which advisor to follow.
Nowhere is this more true than in the case of asset protection. I have been told by some attorneys, including Garrett, that they really like Nevada LLC's for the privacy they provide. I have had other attorneys tell me they don't like Nevada because of the cost, the current focus of the IRS on Nevada companies or because of the legal system in Nevada. I'm not saying that one is right and one is wrong. What I am saying is that each person's situation is different and you need a good wealth coach to help you identify which option is best for you and to work with the attorneys to make a good decision.
By the way, Garrett saw my blog and got back to me right away with his comment (see below under "Comments" to the previous blog entry. I understand Garrett's position. It certainly is more expensive to use an offshort APT than a domestic APT. The question is simply the level of protection you want. Some people are fine relying on their umbrella insurance policy with no LLC's at all. Others want the protection of LLC's. But some people want the most protection possible and I have not seen anything that is better than the offshore APT. And the way Doug sets these up, the APT does not go offshore until there is a triggering event. So, Garrett and Doug are both correct - it just depends on where you are and what level of asset protection you desire.
Warmest regards,
Tom